Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice

Omonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, Омонов, Зафаржон

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

The article examines the substantive content of the quality criteria applicable to decisions made by an investigating judge concerning the revocation or modification of preventive measures, namely legality, reasoned justification, and fairness. The empirical basis of the study comprises a qualitative analysis of more than 200 rulings issued by courts in various regions of the Republic in 2025–2026, as well as official statistics of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2022–2026. The study reveals the widespread use of “template decisions” in national judicial practice, a more than twofold increase in the proportion of motions denied following the introduction of the institution of the investigating judge (from 2.3% to 5.1%), and disparities of up to thirteenfold across regions. The article proposes specifying the content of the fairness criterion through a three-stage proportionality test and an individualization requirement. The study concludes by substantiating three proposals aimed at establishing mandatory substantive requirements for investigating judges’ rulings.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarOmonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, Омонов, Зафаржон
JurnalЖамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations
NashriyotIn Science МЧЖ
ISSN2181-1415
Nashr sanasi2026-08-25
Jild7
Son4
Betlar261-268
TilIngliz
Ilmiy sohaYuridik
DOI10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268
Indeksga qo‘shilgan2026-09-09

Kalit so‘zlar

тергов судьяси, қонунийлик, асослилик, адолатлилик, мутаносиблик, шаблон қарорлар, негатив мотивлаш мажбурияти, индивидуаллаштириш, следственный судья, законность, обоснованность, справедливость, пропорциональность, шаблонные решения, обязанность негативной мотивировки, индивидуализация, investigative judge, legality, validity, fairness, proportionality, template decisions, duty to provide reasons for refusal, individualization

Ilmiy soha

Iqtibos keltirish

APAOmonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, & Омонов, Зафаржон (2026). Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice. Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations, 7(4), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268
GOST (OAK)Omonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, Омонов, Зафаржон Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice // Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations. – 2026. – T. 7, № 4. – P. 261-268. – DOI: 10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268.
MLAOmonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, and Омонов, Зафаржон. “Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice.” Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations, 7(4), 261-268, 2026. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268
ChicagoOmonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, and Омонов, Зафаржон. “Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice.” Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations, 7(4), 261-268 (2026). https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268
HarvardOmonov, Zafarjon, Омонов, Зафаржон, and Омонов, Зафаржон (2026) ‘Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice’, Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations, 7(4), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268
BibTeX
@article{omonovzafarjon2026,
  title = {Criteria of Legality, Validity, and Fairness of Investigative Judges’ Decisions: A Theoretical Analysis and Assessment Based on Judicial Practice},
  author = {Omonov, Zafarjon and Омонов, Зафаржон and Омонов, Зафаржон},
  journal = {Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {261-268},
  doi = {10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4-pp261-268}
}

Boshqa maqola uchun iqtibos tayyorlash

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations — barcha maqolalar · 2026-yil arxivi

Omonov, Zafarjon — boshqa maqolalari

Yuridik sohasidagi boshqa maqolalar

Yuridik sohasidagi OAK jurnallari