Distinctive features of evaluating an expert linguist's conclusion in cases involving extremism

Mansurov , Oybek, Мансуров, Ойбек, Mansurov , Oybek

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations · 2025-yil

Annotatsiya

This article analyzes the assessment and practical significance of expert opinions issued by the Forensic Political Science Linguistic Expertise department of the Republican Forensic Examination Institution named after Kh. Sulaymonova. These opinions are evaluated by officials conducting pre-investigation checks, investigators, inquiry officers, or courts. Additionally, the article provides specific proposals and recommendations to address existing gaps in national legislation regarding the criteria for evaluating these expert opinions.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarMansurov , Oybek, Мансуров, Ойбек, Mansurov , Oybek
JurnalЖамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations
Nashr sanasi2025-01-20
Jild6
Son1/S
Betlar222-231
TilO‘zbek
DOI10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss1/s-pp222-231

Kalit so‘zlar

ekspert xulosasi, xulosalarni baholash, protsessual tartib, xulosaning obyektivligi, ekspert tekshiruvi obyektlari, kompetentlik, экспертное заключение, оценка заключений, процессуальный порядок, объективность заключения, объекты экспертного исследования, компетентность, expert opinion, evaluation of conclusions, procedural order, objectivity of the conclusion, objects of expert examination, competence

Ilmiy soha

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations — barcha maqolalar