Problems of Improving Article 209 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan: Gaps and Ways of Reform

Allaev, Temur, Аллаев, Темур, Allayev, Temur

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

The article examines legislative gaps in the current wording of Article 209 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on official forgery. The author traces the legislative history of the norm since 1994, noting that only one substantive amendment was introduced in 2015, while its disposition and sanctions remained largely unchanged. Three principal deficiencies are identified: first, the absence of differentiated damage thresholds, including large and especially large damage, unlike analogous official crimes under Articles 205–208; second, the vagueness of the concept of “substantial harm” in the disposition; and third, the insufficient correlation between the sanctions and the actual gravity of the harm caused. Specific proposals are formulated for amending the norm and supplementing the Plenum resolution.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarAllaev, Temur, Аллаев, Темур, Allayev, Temur
JurnalЖамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations
Nashr sanasi2026-05-25
Jild7
Son5/S
Betlar958-964
TilRus
DOI10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss5/s-pp958-964

Kalit so‘zlar

должностной подлог, статья 209, Уголовный кодекс Узбекистана, существенный вред, размер ущерба, санкции, реформирование законодательства, должностные преступления, official forgery, Article 209, Criminal Code of Uzbekistan, substantial harm, damage threshold, sanctions, legislative reform, official crimes, mansab soxtakorligi, 209-modda, Jinoyat kodeksi, jiddiy zarar, zarar chegarasi, sanksiyalar, qonunchilik islohoti, mansab jinoyatlari

Ilmiy soha

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations — barcha maqolalar