The Role of AAOIFI, IFSB, and Basel Committee International Standards in Ensuring the Regulatory Coherence of Dual Banking Systems

Abdullokh, Sodik, Абдуллох, Содик, Abdulloh, Sodiq

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

The rapid expansion of Islamic finance globally has necessitated the development of specialized regulatory frameworks that can operate alongside conventional banking supervision. This study investigates the complementary roles of three principal standard-setting bodies—the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI), the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB), and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)—in achieving regulatory coherence within dual banking systems. Five distinct levels of standards interaction were identified: capital adequacy, liquidity management, Shariah governance, core regulatory principles, and institutional coordination. The IFSB-23 standard, adopted in 2023, was found to serve as an effective bridge between Basel III capital requirements and the profit-and-loss-sharing nature of Islamic financial contracts, introducing the alpha-factor mechanism for calibrating capital requirements applicable to profit-sharing investment accounts. AAOIFI standards complement this prudential framework by providing detailed guidance on Shariah compliance, financial accounting, and governance structures specific to Islamic financial institutions. A comparative legal analysis of implementation models in Malaysia, Bahrain, and the UAE revealed three distinct approaches: Malaysia’s integrated model with a single regulator, Bahrain’s direct mandatory adoption of AAOIFI standards, and the UAE’s hierarchical system prioritizing national regulation while aligning with international standards. The study further examined the emerging regulatory landscape of the Republic of Uzbekistan, where Law No. ZRU-1126 of March 2026 established a legal framework for Islamic banking, creating an Islamic Finance Council under the Central Bank. Based on the comparative analysis, the adapted Malaysian model was recommended as optimal for Uzbekistan, combining centralized regulation with the flexible integration of IFSB prudential standards and AAOIFI Shariah guidance. The findings suggest that regulatory coherence in dual banking systems requires a systematic approach that simultaneously addresses prudential requirements, Shariah compliance, and institutional capacity building during the transitional period.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarAbdullokh, Sodik, Абдуллох, Содик, Abdulloh, Sodiq
JurnalЖамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations
Nashr sanasi2026-04-25
Jild7
Son4/S
Betlar224-232
TilRus
DOI10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss4/s-pp224-232

Kalit so‘zlar

пруденциальное регулирование, шариатское соответствие, финансовая гармонизация, инвестиционные вкладчики, дуальный надзор, prudential regulation, Sharia compliance, financial harmonization, investment investors, dual supervision, prudensial tartibga solish, shariat muvofiqligiga rioya, moliyaviy uyg‘unlashtirish, investitsion omonatchilar, dual nazorat

Ilmiy soha

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations — barcha maqolalar