Structure and content of the expert opinion as a source of evidence and its assessment

Ganiyev, Otabek, Ганиев , Отабек, Ganiyev, Otabek

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations · 2024-yil

Annotatsiya

This article analyzes the structure and content of the forensic examination report, as well as issues of its assessment from the point of view of scientific validity and compliance with the procedural rules established for the examination. There is a lack of a clear and unified methodology for assessing expert opinions. All components of a forensic expert's report (introduction, research and conclusion) are examined in detail in the context of current legislation. Based on an analysis of the theoretical views of a number of criminologists, the need to take into account the procedural requirements for drawing up an expert opinion and the importance of its evaluation as a source of evidentiary information is emphasized. The features of evaluating an expert opinion are highlighted, with an emphasis on aspects that are important for the investigator and the court when checking the content of the expert opinion. It is emphasized that the legally established structure of the expert opinion facilitates the systematic analysis and evaluation of its various parts. Recommendations are offered for conducting expert research and monitoring the presentation of results.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarGaniyev, Otabek, Ганиев , Отабек, Ganiyev, Otabek
JurnalЖамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations
Nashr sanasi2024-01-25
Jild5
Son1
Betlar261-274
TilO‘zbek
DOI10.47689/2181-1415-vol5-iss1-pp261-274

Kalit so‘zlar

судебно-экспертная деятельность, судебный эксперт, заключение эксперта, содержание экспертного заключения, вводная часть экспертного заключения, исследовательская часть экспертного заключения, заключительная часть экспертного заключения, дополнительная экспертиза, повторная экспертиза, комиссионная экспертиза, комплексная экспертиза, экспертное исследование, оценка экспертного заключения как доказательства, приемлемость экспертного заключения, время проведения экспертизы, место проведения экспертизы, основания проведения экспертизы, вопросы, поставленные перед экспертом, качество исходных материалов, методы и приемы исследования, forensic expert activity, forensic expert, expert opinion, the content of the expert opinion, the introductory part of the expert opinion, the research part of the expert opinion, the final part of the expert opinion, additional examination, re-examination, commission examination, complex examination, expert research, evaluation of the expert opinion as evidence, acceptability of the expert opinion, carrying out expertise, the place of the examination, the grounds for the examination, the questions posed to the expert, the quality of the source materials, methods and techniques of researchmethods and techniques of research, sud-ekspertlik faoliyati, sud eksperti, ekspertning xulosasi, ekspert xulosasining mazmuni, ekspert xulosasining kirish qismi, ekspert xulosasining tadqiqot qismi, ekspert xulosasining yakunlovchi qismi, qo‘shimcha ekspertiza, qayta ekspertiza, komissiyaviy ekspertiza, kompleks ekspertiza, ekspertiza tadqiqotlari, ekspert xulosasini dalil sifatida baholash, ekspert xulosasining maqbulligi, ekspertizani o‘tkazish vaqti, ekspertizani o‘tkazish joyi, ekspertiza o‘tkazish asoslari, ekspert imzosi bilan tasdiqlangan uning huquq va majburiyatlarini tushuntirish, sud ekspertiga hal qilish uchun berilgan savollar, dastlabki materiallarining sifatliligi, tadqiqot usullari va uslublari

Ilmiy soha

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Жамият ва инновациялар / Общество и инновации / Society and innovations — barcha maqolalar