This research examines the critical challenges confronting legal systems in regulating and prosecuting AI model poisoning as cybercrime. Through qualitative doctrinal analysis and comprehensive document review, the study evaluates international legal frameworks addressing AI poisoning, explores prosecution difficulties including proving intent and establishing liability, and assesses regulatory roles in preventing incidents. Findings reveal significant gaps in existing cybercrime statutes that fail to recognize AI poisoning as distinct offenses, creating uncertainty for law enforcement. The automated nature of machine learning obscures causation chains, making liability determinations nearly impossible under traditional legal principles. Cross-border enforcement fails because international agreements like the Budapest Convention lack specific provisions for AI attacks spanning multiple jurisdictions. Courts operate without precedents, forcing reliance on inadequate analogies to conventional cybercrimes. The research recommends enacting comprehensive legislation explicitly criminalizing AI poisoning, updating international treaties to facilitate cooperation, establishing mandatory security standards for high-risk systems, and developing specialized forensic capabilities within law enforcement agencies to address these emerging technological threats effectively.
| Mualliflar | AllahRakha, Naeem |
|---|---|
| Jurnal | The Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy (UJLDP) |
| Nashr sanasi | 2025-12-30 |
| Jild | 3 |
| Son | 6 |
| Betlar | 28–51 |
| Til | Ingliz |
| DOI | 10.59022/ujldp.472 |
DOI: 10.59022/ujldp.472 · Maqolaning asl sahifasi
AI Model Poisoning, Cybercrimes, Prosecution, Legal Frameworks, Algorithmic Manipulation
The phenomenon of globalization in civil law regulation of blockchain technologies is examined using the example of Japan's Payment Services Act. In the context of active economic digitalization, the problem of…
This article examines the legal status of smart contracts across different jurisdictions through a comparative legal methodology, analyzing regulatory approaches in the United States, European Union, Switzerland…
This article presents a comprehensive classification system for licensing agreements in biotechnology, analyzing diverse license types including exclusive, non-exclusive, sole, and compulsory licenses, alongside…
Digital traces constitute a fundamental category of forensic evidence in contemporary criminal investigations, yet their conceptualization remains fragmented across jurisdictions. This study examines the theoretical…
This article presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the legal frameworks governing the protection of special categories of personal data in Uzbekistan, the European Union, and the United States. The study…
This article examines the complex regulatory challenges facing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with a particular focus on safety, privacy, and liability considerations. Through analysis of international best practices…
Deepfake technology has emerged as a critical legal threat to autonomous systems worldwide, yet Uzbekistan's existing legal framework remains fundamentally unprepared to address it. This research examines the adequacy…
This article examines the problem of liability allocation for harmful content posted by users on digital platforms. The author analyzes the contradiction between protecting victims' rights from defamation, hate speech…
This research examines the principle of prohibition of discrimination in the field of labor and employment by comparing national legal frameworks with international standards. The study explores how different…
This research explores how regulators and policymakers address the rising threat of sensor spoofing in autonomous vehicles. It highlights the growing importance of cybersecurity and accountability in the safe deployment…
The Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy (UJLDP) — barcha maqolalar