This article examines the problem of liability allocation for harmful content posted by users on digital platforms. The author analyzes the contradiction between protecting victims' rights from defamation, hate speech, and intellectual property violations, and ensuring freedom of expression and the development of the digital economy. The study highlights the inadequacy of the traditional dichotomy between publishers and passive intermediaries in the context of modern platforms that actively curate, rank, and monetize user content through algorithmic systems. Based on comparative legal analysis, the author identifies three regulatory models: the American broad immunity model under Section 230, the European conditional exemption model with notice and takedown mechanism under the E-Commerce Directive and Digital Services Act, and the German differentiated liability model. Special attention is given to content moderation problems, risks of excessive censorship through automated filtering, and opacity of algorithmic decisions. The author identifies the absence of special platform liability rules in Uzbek legislation and proposes comprehensive regulatory modernization measures.
| Mualliflar | Allakuliev, Mirzhalol |
|---|---|
| Jurnal | The Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy (UJLDP) |
| Nashr sanasi | 2025-10-30 |
| Jild | 3 |
| Son | 5 |
| Betlar | 20-35 |
| Til | Ingliz |
| DOI | 10.59022/ujldp.376 |
DOI: 10.59022/ujldp.376 · Maqolaning asl sahifasi
Digital Platforms, Intermediary Liability, User-Generated Content, Online Defamation, Freedom of Expression, Notice and Takedown, Digital Services Act, Uzbekistan
This article examines the complex regulatory challenges facing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with a particular focus on safety, privacy, and liability considerations. Through analysis of international best practices…
This research explores how regulators and policymakers address the rising threat of sensor spoofing in autonomous vehicles. It highlights the growing importance of cybersecurity and accountability in the safe deployment…
Digital traces constitute a fundamental category of forensic evidence in contemporary criminal investigations, yet their conceptualization remains fragmented across jurisdictions. This study examines the theoretical…
The fast growth of digital technology and global connectivity has changed the way human rights are protected and enforced. It has created new challenges in balancing people’s freedoms with the security needs of states…
This article examines the legal status of smart contracts across different jurisdictions through a comparative legal methodology, analyzing regulatory approaches in the United States, European Union, Switzerland…
The dark web economy represents a sophisticated underground marketplace ecosystem that poses unprecedented challenges to law enforcement agencies worldwide. This study examines the structural complexities, operational…
This research examines the critical challenges confronting legal systems in regulating and prosecuting AI model poisoning as cybercrime. Through qualitative doctrinal analysis and comprehensive document review, the…
The rapid expansion of digital markets has led to unprecedented economic concentration, driven primarily by large technology platforms acquiring, integrating, or excluding smaller competitors through mechanisms often…
The phenomenon of globalization in civil law regulation of blockchain technologies is examined using the example of Japan's Payment Services Act. In the context of active economic digitalization, the problem of…
Investment disputes represent one of the most complex areas of international commercial law, requiring specialized resolution mechanisms that balance investor protection with host state sovereignty. This study examines…
The Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy (UJLDP) — barcha maqolalar