THE IMPACT OF THE CRIME COMMISSION METHOD ON THE SOCIAL DANGER OF THE ACT: ANALYSIS AND PROPOSAL

Худайкулов Ферузбек Хуррамович

Ҳуқуқий тадқиқотлар /Правовые исследования/ Journal of Law Research · 2025-yil

Annotatsiya

This article extensively uses logical, inductive, deductive, systematic, logical-legal, and comparativelegal methods. Primarily, the concept of the method of committing a crime is elucidated, along withits place among the optional features of the objective side of the corpus delicti. It is noted that incriminal law theory, there are several issues related to the method of committing a crime. These issuesare said to be subject to contentious discussions in scientific research, and finding solutions to themdirectly influences the definition of the method of committing a crime. Secondly, in criminal lawtheory, a group of scholars has highlighted the specific criminal-legal significance of the method ofcommitting a crime, referring to them as a "triad" with distinct criminal-legal importance. Theseconsist of the following: a) direct stipulation in the criminal law norm as a necessary (constructive)element of the corpus delicti; b) inclusion in the aggravating part of the relevant article in the SpecialPart of the Criminal Code as an aggravating feature of the corpus delicti (objective aspect); c)consideration as "Mitigating or aggravating circumstances" when imposing punishment. Thirdly, thisarticle states the following: among the optional features of the objective aspect, the method ofcommitting a crime holds the highest legal significance. This is because the method of committing acrime often carries special legal importance in qualifying the act. Furthermore, when multiple crimesare committed, if one crime serves as a means or method of committing another, and the elements ofboth crimes are specified in the disposition of the relevant article of the Criminal Code, the act shouldbe qualified under only one article of the Criminal Code - the one that establishes liability for themore serious crime. In such cases, additional qualification of the act under an article providing forliability for the less serious crime is not required. Furthermore, this article focuses on the optionalfeature of the objective element of the crime, specifically the criminal-legal significance of themethod of committing the crime. It examines its distinctive criminal-legal aspects, as well astheoretical and practical issues related to the methods of committing certain crimes listed in theCriminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Additionally, the criminal legislation of the RussianFederation, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan has been analyzed, and specificproposals and recommendations have been developed to improve the criminal legislation of theRepublic of Uzbekistan in this regard

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarХудайкулов Ферузбек Хуррамович
JurnalҲуқуқий тадқиқотлар /Правовые исследования/ Journal of Law Research
Nashr sanasi2025-07-18
Jild10
Son5/2
TilO‘zbek

Kalit so‘zlar

преступление, общественная опасность, состав преступления, объективная сторона преступления, необходимые признаки, факультативные признаки, способ совершения преступления, обман, запугивание, уголовно-правовые аспекты других способов, уголовноправовое значение., jinoyat, ijtimoiy xavflilik, jinoyat tarkibi, jinoyat obyektiv tomoni, zaruriy belgilar, fakultativ belgilar, jinoyat sodir etish usuli, aldash, qo‘rqitish, boshqa usullar jinoyat-huquqiy jihatlari, jinoyat-huquqiy ahamiyati., crime, social danger, corpus delicti, objective sign of crime, essential sings, facultative sings, methods of committing a crime, deception, intimidation, other methods, criminal law aspects, criminal law significance.

Ilmiy soha

Ҳуқуқий тадқиқотлар /Правовые исследования/ Journal of Law Research jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Ҳуқуқий тадқиқотлар /Правовые исследования/ Journal of Law Research — barcha maqolalar