Metadiscourse as a mechanism of academic legitimization in english and uzbek research articles

Alijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon

Science time · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

This study investigates metadiscourse as a central mechanism of academic legitimization in English and Uzbek research articles. The research examines how metadiscursive resources regulate argumentative organization, guide reader interpretation, and construct epistemic credibility across two distinct scholarly traditions. Drawing on a comparative discourse analytical framework, the study analyzes interactional and textual metadiscourse in selected research articles from humanities and social sciences disciplines. The findings reveal that in English academic writing metadiscourse frequently functions through dialogic engagement, calibrated epistemic positioning, and explicit reader orientation. In contrast, Uzbek research articles demonstrate a stronger reliance on structural coherence, cumulative reasoning, and integrative generalization as mechanisms of legitimization. Despite these differences, both discourse traditions employ metadiscourse as a regulatory layer that aligns argumentative development with culturally embedded models of scholarly authority. The study proposes a linguopragmatic model of academic legitimization in which metadiscourse mediates between argumentative structuring and epistemic evaluation. The findings contribute to cross linguistic discourse studies by clarifying how academic credibility is discursively constructed within different communicative frameworks.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarAlijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon
JurnalScience time
NashriyotАжиниёз номидаги Нукус давлат педагогика институти
ISSN2992-8850
Nashr sanasi2026-05-04
Jild4
Son5/1
Betlar37-44
TilIngliz
Ilmiy sohaFilologiya
DOI10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834
Indeksga qo‘shilgan2026-08-27

DOI: 10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834 · Maqolaning asl sahifasi

Kalit so‘zlar

metadiscourse, academic legitimization, research articles, epistemic positioning, academic discourse, linguopragmatics, cross linguistic analysis, scholarly communication.

Ilmiy soha

Filologiya

Iqtibos keltirish

APAAlijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon (2026). METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES. Science time, 4(5/1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834
GOST (OAK)Alijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES // Science time. – 2026. – T. 4, № 5/1. – P. 37-44. – DOI: 10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834.
MLAAlijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon. “METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES.” Science time, 4(5/1), 37-44, 2026. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834
ChicagoAlijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon. “METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES.” Science time, 4(5/1), 37-44 (2026). https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834
HarvardAlijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon (2026) ‘METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES’, Science time, 4(5/1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834
BibTeX
@article{alijonkizikurbnovashokhidakhon2026,
  title = {METADISCOURSE AS A MECHANISM OF ACADEMIC LEGITIMIZATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK RESEARCH ARTICLES},
  author = {Alijon kizi Kurbnova, Shokhidakhon},
  journal = {Science time},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5/1},
  pages = {37-44},
  doi = {10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.66345/stj.v4i5/1.5834}
}

Boshqa maqola uchun iqtibos tayyorlash

Science time jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Science time — barcha maqolalar · 2026-yil arxivi

Filologiya sohasidagi boshqa maqolalar

Filologiya sohasidagi OAK jurnallari