Criteria for evaluating the conclusions of forensic expert institutions and their specific features

KUDRATOV , Sanjar

Юрист ахборотномаси · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the procedural nature of a forensic expert’s opinion as evidence in criminal proceedings, the criteria for its assessment, and the theoretical and legal issues arising in law enforcement practice. The study examines the scientific validity, reliability, admissibility, and consistency of an expert opinion with other evidence as key factors determining its significance in the process of proof. The author substantiates that the current criminal procedural legislation does not sufficiently establish a special and differentiated procedure for assessing expert opinions, which leads to divergent approaches in law enforcement practice. The article considers compliance with procedural requirements, determination of the expert’s competence and impartiality, authenticity of the objects of examination and comparative samples, scientific reliability of the applied methodologies, logical consistency, and clarity of the opinion as separate assessment criteria. In addition, the necessity of developing a unified regulatory and methodological approach to the assessment of opinions issued by both state and non-state forensic expert institutions is substantiated. The conclusion notes that the implementation of the proposed criteria in practice will contribute to improving the effectiveness of evidence assessment, preventing procedural errors, and ensuring the quality of justice. The findings of the study are significant in terms of strengthening procedural guarantees for the use of special knowledge in criminal cases, ensuring an objective assessment of the evidentiary value of expert opinions, and establishing unified standards in judicial and investigative practice.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarKUDRATOV , Sanjar
JurnalЮрист ахборотномаси
NashriyotАдлия вазирлиги Юристлар МОМ
ISSN2181-9416, 2187-9416
Nashr sanasi2026-06-30
Jild1
Son3
Betlar140-147
TilIngliz
Ilmiy sohaYuridik
Indeksga qo‘shilgan2026-08-26

Maqolaning asl sahifasi

Kalit so‘zlar

sud ekspertizasi, davlat va nodavlat sud eksperti, ekspert xulosasi, dalillar, jinoyat protsessi, baholash mezonlari, protsessual talablar, ilmiy asoslanganlik, xolislik, ishonchlilik.

Ilmiy soha

Yuridik

Iqtibos keltirish

APAKUDRATOV , Sanjar (2026). CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE CONCLUSIONS OF FORENSIC EXPERT INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES. Юрист ахборотномаси, 1(3), 140-147. https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1239
GOST (OAK)KUDRATOV , Sanjar CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE CONCLUSIONS OF FORENSIC EXPERT INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES // Юрист ахборотномаси. – 2026. – T. 1, № 3. – P. 140-147.
MLAKUDRATOV , Sanjar. “CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE CONCLUSIONS OF FORENSIC EXPERT INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES.” Юрист ахборотномаси, 1(3), 140-147, 2026. https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1239
ChicagoKUDRATOV , Sanjar. “CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE CONCLUSIONS OF FORENSIC EXPERT INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES.” Юрист ахборотномаси, 1(3), 140-147 (2026). https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1239
HarvardKUDRATOV , Sanjar (2026) ‘CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE CONCLUSIONS OF FORENSIC EXPERT INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES’, Юрист ахборотномаси, 1(3), 140-147. https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1239
BibTeX
@article{kudratovsanjar2026,
  title = {CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE CONCLUSIONS OF FORENSIC EXPERT INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR SPECIFIC FEATURES},
  author = {KUDRATOV , Sanjar},
  journal = {Юрист ахборотномаси},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {1},
  number = {3},
  pages = {140-147},
  url = {https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1239}
}

Boshqa maqola uchun iqtibos tayyorlash

Юрист ахборотномаси jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Юрист ахборотномаси — barcha maqolalar · 2026-yil arxivi

KUDRATOV , Sanjar — boshqa maqolalari

Yuridik sohasidagi boshqa maqolalar

Yuridik sohasidagi OAK jurnallari