Not a party, not a problem: the dilemma of extending arbitration clause to non-signatory states

Isakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, Isakulov , Abduaziz

Юриспруденция · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

This article will explore the case law regarding the extension of the arbitration clause to non-signatories, in particular, to states via the prism of state enterprises in international commercial arbitration cases. In this paper, the author will also discuss the legal grounds and doctrinal theories utilized in commercial arbitration cases for reaching decisions on extending the arbitration clause to the non-signatory state, and it will try to argue about the caveats and pitfalls that coexist in such disputes. Furthermore, specific cases along with their solutions, such as the Pyramids case and Zeevi Holdings, are presented in order to elaborate on the given concept, namely arbitration and its role on a global scale.

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarIsakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, Isakulov , Abduaziz
JurnalЮриспруденция
NashriyotТошкент давлат юридик университети
ISSN2181-1938
Nashr sanasi2026-02-18
Jild3
Son5
Betlar54-59
TilIngliz
Ilmiy sohaYuridik
Indeksga qo‘shilgan2026-08-27

Maqolaning asl sahifasi

Kalit so‘zlar

state, state-owned enterprises, alter ego, state attribution, Pyramids case, Zeevi Holdings v. The Republic of Bulgaria and The Privatization Agency of The Republic of Bulgaria, agency theory, intervention of state, государство, государственные предприятия, альтер эго, атрибуция вины государству, Zeevi Holdings против Республики Болгария и Агентства по приватизации Республики Болгария, агентская теория, вмешательство государства, davlat, davlat korxonalari, alter ego, aybni davlatga yuklash, Zeevi Holdings Bolgariya Respublikasiga qarshi va Bolgariya Respublikasining xususiylashtirish agentligi, agentlik nazariyasi, davlat aralashuvi

Ilmiy soha

Yuridik

Iqtibos keltirish

APAIsakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, & Isakulov , Abduaziz (2026). NOT A PARTY, NOT A PROBLEM: THE DILEMMA OF EXTENDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY STATES. Юриспруденция, 3(5), 54-59. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/598
GOST (OAK)Isakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, Isakulov , Abduaziz NOT A PARTY, NOT A PROBLEM: THE DILEMMA OF EXTENDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY STATES // Юриспруденция. – 2026. – T. 3, № 5. – P. 54-59.
MLAIsakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, and Isakulov , Abduaziz. “NOT A PARTY, NOT A PROBLEM: THE DILEMMA OF EXTENDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY STATES.” Юриспруденция, 3(5), 54-59, 2026. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/598
ChicagoIsakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, and Isakulov , Abduaziz. “NOT A PARTY, NOT A PROBLEM: THE DILEMMA OF EXTENDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY STATES.” Юриспруденция, 3(5), 54-59 (2026). https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/598
HarvardIsakulov , Abduaziz, Исакулов , Абдуазиз, and Isakulov , Abduaziz (2026) ‘NOT A PARTY, NOT A PROBLEM: THE DILEMMA OF EXTENDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY STATES’, Юриспруденция, 3(5), 54-59. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/598
BibTeX
@article{isakulovabduaziz2026,
  title = {NOT A PARTY, NOT A PROBLEM: THE DILEMMA OF EXTENDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY STATES},
  author = {Isakulov , Abduaziz and Исакулов , Абдуазиз and Isakulov , Abduaziz},
  journal = {Юриспруденция},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {3},
  number = {5},
  pages = {54-59},
  url = {https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/598}
}

Boshqa maqola uchun iqtibos tayyorlash

Юриспруденция jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Юриспруденция — barcha maqolalar · 2026-yil arxivi

Yuridik sohasidagi boshqa maqolalar

Yuridik sohasidagi OAK jurnallari