It is a known fact that in the national linguistic sciences of post-Soviet Central Asia and Azerbaijan, traditionally the grammatical theory of Russian (Soviet) linguistics and its approach and interpretation methods have been used as the theoretical and practical foundations of the study of language. This is especially evident when interpreting grammatical categories. These incorrect approaches were once criticized by the famous Turkologist Prof. S.N. Ivanov, who drew attention to situations in which grammatical categories in Turkiс dialects were treated as in Russian and German, or grammatical categories such as gender (in nouns) and aspect (in verbs) were «inserted» into them. As is known, in the Indo-European linguistic tradition there are 5 conditions for the existence of grammatical categories: 1) a grammatical category is a system consisting of a set of opposite linguistic forms that have homogeneous meanings; 2) the grammatical category covers related morphological forms or is expressed by several morphological elements; 3) the grammatical category is mandatory for all elements of the part of speech; 4) the category is necessary for any language unit; they cannot exist outside the grammatical category; 5) the category is preserved only within one part of speech. Grammatical categories in Turkiс dialects, for example, the forms and meanings of the possessive category do not correspond to the 5 conditions indicated above, in particular: 1) a noun in Turkiс does not accept possessive suffixes outside the communication process (for example, okul, kitap); therefore, there is no pair of its opposites (violation of condition 1); 2) the category of belonging applies not only to names; on the contrary, numbers, pronouns and other words with objective meaning in Turkic dialectes can tend to the possessive category: dördünüz, ikimiz; bizim, senin, kendisi (violation of condition 5). In addition, similar violations are also observed in the categories of case and number in nouns; pronouns and verbs also take a plural suffix, forming an honorific category: Uzbek. dädäm+lär keldi+lär (dad come); Uygur. ulä kesillä (he may come); Turkish. binler(ce), onlar and ets . In recent years, it has become common for scholars to describe grammatical categories in Turkic dialectes as semantic categories arising from the linguistic nature and structural features of the Turkish language, rather than describing them as formal-grammatical categories, as in Indo-European. Inouropinion,thenature(essence)ofgrammatical categories in Turkiс dialectes is as follows: The approaches currently used for grammatical categories in Turkic linguistics are not suitable for the nature and structure of our language. Grammatical categories in Turkic languages can be characterized as semantic, or rather functional-semantic categories. In Turkic languages, some linguistic units (words) may go beyond this category and, as in any language, are examples of grammatical violations in Turkic dialects. Grammatical categories in Turkic dialects are semi-semantic, multifaceted and multifunctional, some of them continue their functions in one part of speech, while most of them function in several parts of speech. In the grammatical categories of Turkic dialects, the special form (suffix) does not change, but its meanings may change, since the meanings of a certain affix are interrelated. The sum of these meanings will determine the nature of a particular grammatical category. In Turkic dialects, the meanings of grammatical categories are formed only by agglutination.
| Mualliflar | ELTAZAROV Joliboy |
|---|---|
| Jurnal | Филологик тадқиқотлар: тил, адабиёт, таълим |
| Nashr sanasi | 2024-09-12 |
| Jild | 7 |
| Son | 7-8 |
| Til | O‘zbek |
GRAMER KATEGORİLERİN TÜRKÇENİN
This article focuses on modern scientific paradigms in world linguistics and the areas that comprise them. Based on theoretical sources, the reasons that led to the change in the scientific paradigm are proven.
This article reveals the essence of the concept of phraseological unit in linguistics, that phraseological unit is a lexical unit that expresses the same meaning in content, equivalent to a phrase or sentence in its…
This article talks about means that serve to increase the communicative and pragmatic effectiveness of the text, discursive loads that are actively involved in the communicative process.
This article describes the importance of creating an anthropocentric dictionary of metaphors in the Uzbek language and the principles of creating such a dictionary
In linguistics, a lot of experience is felt in analyzing the knowledge of different fields, in determining the connections between the categories of linguistics. This is also reflected in the relationship between status…
Education in higher educational institutions in the following years of the independence of the Republic of Uzbekistan a lot of freedom was given in organizing the process. This process is international of higher…
This article is devoted to the analysis of issues related to the implementation of the law «On the State Language». It attempts to comprehensively analyze the processes associated with the regulation of geographical…
One of the most important conditions for the existence and development of human culture is its communication through language. Indeed, in human communicative activity, the concepts of language and culture intersect and…
The increasing development of linguistic services in the modern market is determined by many factors. In an increasingly globalized world, new types of manufacturing companies are rapidly developing. They need to…
One of the most important conditions for the existence and development of human culture is its communication through language. Indeed, in human communicative activity, the concepts of language and culture intersect and…
Филологик тадқиқотлар: тил, адабиёт, таълим — barcha maqolalar