ABSENCE OF JURISDICTION AND CONSEQUENCES IN ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS

Bakhramova , Mokhinur, Бахрамова , Мохинур, Bahramova , Mohinur

Юриспруденция · 2026-yil

Annotatsiya

The Arbitration Act 1996 states that a request for a stay must be conceded before the individual against whom the procedures were brought has made any move to respond substantively to the case and no sooner than after fitting technical advancements (assuming any) are made to recognize the lawful procedures. The ZPO provides that the challenge must arise prior to the start of the oral hearing on the matter of the dispute. When raising an issue with the courts of law, jurisdiction is of the utmost important for the assurance of whether the option to arbitrate may be postponed. Noncompliance may result in the court continuing to consider the subject of the dispute and, for the most part, make a choice that will exert jurisdiction upon the parties. Despite the fact that the arbitral tribunal may not be limited by the court’s choice, it is, on a basic level, necessary to contemplate upon a protest by one of the parties, regardless of whether the option to arbitrate has been postponed. 

Maqola ma’lumotlari
MualliflarBakhramova , Mokhinur, Бахрамова , Мохинур, Bahramova , Mohinur
JurnalЮриспруденция
Nashr sanasi2026-02-04
Jild1
Son6
Betlar81-87

Maqolaning asl sahifasi

Kalit so‘zlar

the UNCITRAL Аrbitrаtiоn Rules, the Private International Law Act (PILA), the New York Convention, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, the oil organization Yukos., Арбитражный регламент ЮНСИТРАЛ, Закон о международном частном праве (PILA), Нью-Йоркская конвенция, Торговая палата Стокгольма, нефтяная организация ЮКОС., UNCITRAL arbitraj qoidalari, Xalqaro xususiy huquq qonuni (PILA), Nyu-York konvensiyasi, Stokgolm savdo palatasi, Yukos neft tashkiloti.

Ilmiy soha

Yuridik

Юриспруденция jurnalidan boshqa maqolalar

Юриспруденция — barcha maqolalar